From: | Jason Neyers <jneyers@uwo.ca> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 08/01/2009 15:01:35 UTC |
Subject: | ODG: Vicarious Liability |
I post on behalf of Eoin Quill:
Members might be interested in a recent Irish Supreme Court decision on
vicarious liability for sex abuse in a school setting; the ratio was
that the relationship between the state and a teacher was not sufficient
for vicarious liability, due to a lack of sufficient control (state pays
and has certain functions, such as syllabus, inspection of schools etc,
but day to day management is vested in school boards – mostly run by the
churches and the history of this is set out in some detail in the
judgments).
The court was divided on the issue of whether Bazley/Lister should be
followed; unhelpfully the CJ concurred with two judgments that offered
different dicta on that point, but were agreed on the absence of
sufficient relationship to the wrongdoer.
Before anyone asks, I have no idea why the plaintiff did not join the
school board or church, as earlier cases showed that they might be liable.
The case is O’Keeffe v Hickey & Ireland [2008] IESC 72
Available at
or
http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2008/S72.html
Eoin Quill
School of Law
University of Limerick.
--
Jason Neyers
Associate Professor of Law &
Cassels Brock LLP Faculty Fellow in Contract Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435