From: Jason Neyers <jneyers@uwo.ca>
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Date: 08/01/2009 15:01:35 UTC
Subject: ODG: Vicarious Liability

I post on behalf of Eoin Quill:


Members might be interested in a recent Irish Supreme Court decision on

vicarious liability for sex abuse in a school setting; the ratio was

that the relationship between the state and a teacher was not sufficient

for vicarious liability, due to a lack of sufficient control (state pays

and has certain functions, such as syllabus, inspection of schools etc,

but day to day management is vested in school boards – mostly run by the

churches and the history of this is set out in some detail in the

judgments).


The court was divided on the issue of whether Bazley/Lister should be

followed; unhelpfully the CJ concurred with two judgments that offered

different dicta on that point, but were agreed on the absence of

sufficient relationship to the wrongdoer.


Before anyone asks, I have no idea why the plaintiff did not join the

school board or church, as earlier cases showed that they might be liable.


The case is O’Keeffe v Hickey & Ireland [2008] IESC 72


Available at


http://www.courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/bce24a8184816f1580256ef30048ca50/cd30c67efce085498025752400396b71?OpenDocument


or


http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2008/S72.html


Eoin Quill


School of Law


University of Limerick.


--

Jason Neyers

Associate Professor of Law &

Cassels Brock LLP Faculty Fellow in Contract Law

Faculty of Law

University of Western Ontario

N6A 3K7

(519) 661-2111 x. 88435